Home » P.Diddy

DIDDY AND TWINS COVER VOGUE L’UOMO MAGAZINE

Monday, Oct 27 , 2008 5:43:pm by blackcelebritykids FILED UNDER P.Diddy

Sean “Diddy” Combs and his twin daughters, D’Lila Star and Jessie James (they turn 2 in December) posed for the October cover of L’Uomo Vogue’s music issue. This what the mogul had to say about the photo shoot:

“The concept of ‘Black on Black’ in this story represents a level of strength, a level of beauty, a level of sexy and chic that I really want to portray. It’s the future. And it’s not just a race thing; it’s almost a redefinition of the color. Think about how ignorant people actually make the color black represent something negative. Black is so beautiful, I see it in everything I am, as a person, as a man, as a fashion professional. Black is beautiful.”

Sources:JUSTJARED,URBANHOOPLA

59 Comments

59 Comments to “DIDDY AND TWINS COVER VOGUE L’UOMO MAGAZINE”

  • D.W. October 27, 2008 at 6:42 pm

    I find this completely tasteless! The mere suggestion of them being nude on a magazine cover bothers me.

    Flag this

  • NaiyaJ October 27, 2008 at 7:13 pm

    Oh! I can’t wait for the comments…

    Flag this

  • Katrina October 27, 2008 at 7:14 pm

    I love the twins. They are so so cute!

    Flag this

  • cherie' October 27, 2008 at 7:26 pm

    UUUUUUUUUUUHHHHHHHHHHH CUTE BUT A LITTLE TOO MUCH. THERE ARE MEN OUT THERE, THAT HAVE SICK TWISTED MINDS.

    Flag this

  • BLssd October 27, 2008 at 7:53 pm

    This photo makes me uncomfortable.

    Flag this

  • lala October 27, 2008 at 8:13 pm

    The photo is a little inappropriate.
    It’s not that the children are nude so much as that they are nude in a “bachelor pad” context.
    Their father pimped out with his ruffled shirt and sexy look into the camera.
    There is something vaguely inappropriate about the photo that makes the viewer somewhat uncomfortable.

    Flag this

  • opinionated October 27, 2008 at 8:17 pm

    This is a good pic of Diddy and his adorable twins. Easy to see that he loves them lots. I’m not uncomfortable with what he’s attempting to portray (that part is beautiful). However I think this shot is better suited for family photo albums instead, due to lurking perverted minds .
    Heaven forbid the day young boys/men shows interest in dating the girls, as Daddy Sean is going to be very protective.

    Flag this

  • LaRena October 27, 2008 at 8:17 pm

    I just lost a lot of respect for him – this photo is not only in appropriate but offensive.

    Flag this

  • TheStyleChild October 27, 2008 at 9:13 pm

    Puff’s twins are absolutely adorable! Doubt very seriously though that I would consider doing something like this with my kids… will be interesting to hear his response, if he makes one in re: to the pic being inappropriate…

    Flag this

  • Carlita L. Smith October 27, 2008 at 9:22 pm

    I do see both sides of this photo. I mean the time we are living in makes this photo appear to be very offensive.

    But with that said this photo may be appropriate inside Kim Porter and Diddy’s private home because I see the cuteness in it.

    But this photo is clearly inappropriate for the public viewing. There are too many psychos out there that are searching the net for pictures like this.

    And they should really be careful when putting out photos of their cute babies. 20 years ago this was harmless but today this is flirting with disaster.

    Flag this

  • FELICIA WILSON October 27, 2008 at 9:29 pm

    i also agree this is more of a personal affair. Absolutely nothing wrong with the picture except it should have been kept private

    Flag this

  • tight2def October 27, 2008 at 9:37 pm

    completely distasteful

    Flag this

  • Barlow October 27, 2008 at 11:15 pm

    Dumb diddy, dumb diddy, diddy…, dumb-dumb!!!!!! He could have depicted the black family in a more positive light. IMHO, he looks like he’s pimping two innocent little subjects.

    On another note, Diddy has some pretty babies!!!!

    Flag this

  • Tee October 28, 2008 at 12:12 am

    The kids are adorable!!! THAT IS ALL!

    Flag this

  • lesia October 28, 2008 at 1:13 am

    Wow! I never thought I would see the day that this man who is somewhat of a perfectionist and portrays this classy persona and who sets his standards so high for everyone around him would be a little more considerate and not use his girls to boost his ego even more….photo may have been perfect for the family room not the cover of a magazine….

    Flag this

  • Carlita L. Smith October 28, 2008 at 1:17 am

    I totally agree with you lesia.

    Flag this

  • dani October 28, 2008 at 1:24 am

    I think this is a really cute picture of the twins…Yeah it didnt come out the way he probaly expected it to..I think he wanted the photo to repesent black beauty and everything…I really doubt he is usng the twins/ pimping them..He dosent seem like that type of father..But who knows?? I agree it probaly should have been kept inside there home.

    Flag this

  • Lori October 28, 2008 at 2:39 am

    The girls are adorable but this is one pic that should’ve been kept private. Too many crazies in this world to have a pic like this published for public consumption.

    And I really don’t like what he said he was trying to do……I mean, it’s OK *just for him* but not while his children are in the same photo. It’s too weird.

    Flag this

  • Demetris October 28, 2008 at 2:59 am

    Totally inappropriate! What is the Hell was he thinking putting his innocent children in a magazine nude!?! This is the kind of stuff that happens when you don’t have true guidance in your life ie career. I wonder if Kim thought this picture was suitable for public viewing.

    Flag this

  • Carlita L. Smith October 28, 2008 at 3:37 am

    Demetris- I also wonder myself if Kim approved this photo. One can only wonder that he did not run this past Kim.

    Flag this

  • Jessica October 28, 2008 at 3:40 am

    I agree with Lala, it’s not so much the nudity but the context. But I also wish he would have kept this in his home and not plastered on a magazine for millions of people to see. The girls are so beautiful and I understand the concept but like Maryamb said it didn’t come out the way he probably wanted it too.

    Flag this

  • Jessica October 28, 2008 at 3:41 am

    I also don’t like the bows, I think they are tacky.

    Flag this

  • X October 28, 2008 at 4:36 am

    DO they ever smile?

    Flag this

  • Suz October 28, 2008 at 5:25 am

    That concept and all is nice, but having your children pretty much naked where they’ll be seen all over is crazy. I mean, wow…

    Flag this

  • dee October 28, 2008 at 5:54 am

    Black is beautiful, so it doesn’t need a distasteful gimmick to pimp itself. Let’s see how much he likes the pose when Hefner’s family offers the girls a chance to reenact it on the cover of Hef’s magazine in 16 years. If PDiddy is so concerned with the view of Blackness, he should do some self evaluation.

    Flag this

  • ms t October 28, 2008 at 8:13 am

    the photo looks like a 17th century painting only this one is in kodak and not pastels. love it and the children are beautiful and gloomy.

    Flag this

  • Monique October 28, 2008 at 11:21 am

    i agree with cherie theres some sickos out there

    Flag this

  • shesh1nes October 28, 2008 at 11:52 am

    I can’t believe I’m the only person who doesn’t see so much of a big deal about it. I mean the girls are safe and they’re with daddy…Sometimes I feel like things get so publicized cause we make such a big deal about them.

    …However, I don’t understand why the girls are naked. Like its completely out of context with the rest of the shot. It probably would have made more sense if they were wearing little suits themselves. The nakedness makes you focus on the babies rather than pay attention to this whole black on black theme he’s trying to create.

    Flag this

  • mandude October 28, 2008 at 12:50 pm

    idk i just think that its cute. its not takin away their innocence. i mean most babies do like to run around nude n wats not showing is wats pose to be not showing. as for diddy n the background it cud have been a lil more kid friendly to me.

    Flag this

  • Barlow October 28, 2008 at 1:21 pm

    It would be nice is he’d show the public that he’s able to man up and feature photos of himself and his other little girl. Now, that would be a shared positive image of the black family as well as black manhood, openly embracing and taking care of responsibility.

    Flag this

  • talkingwithtami October 28, 2008 at 1:24 pm

    IM not feelin that pic at all!

    Flag this

  • jwoo2504 October 28, 2008 at 2:05 pm

    All I have to say it looks like it’s a advertisement for something else and they should put the other twins hand in her own lap… Let’s just face it people it’s tacky… I think parents today are trying way to hard to make their children seen instead of letting them have fun and be kids the old fashion way… Parents it’s time to grow up…

    Flag this

  • Katrina October 28, 2008 at 2:34 pm

    Those babies are too cute for words.
    They are absoultely B-E-A-U-T-F-U-L. And they have haters already! LOL

    Flag this

  • Little D October 28, 2008 at 3:23 pm

    They are cute but the picture is just wrong and its nothing cute about it. Yes children do like to run around in the nude but we don’t allow our children to do that outside of our home do we. They could have had on somehting little gowns or something.

    Flag this

  • mandude October 28, 2008 at 3:50 pm

    Little D- yeah i’ll agree wit that. i was thinkin at least a pull up/pamper, whatever they wear but i think its cute only cuz its a father wit his girls.

    Flag this

  • L October 28, 2008 at 4:21 pm

    I didn’t care for the picture.. Whats so special about that. Its just two twins with a bowtie on.

    Flag this

  • Me October 28, 2008 at 4:47 pm

    I think he should have been the one sitting there with only a black tie, when the girls get old enough to make the “statements” they deem appropriate, it will be their choice. I don’t think the picture is appropriate.

    Flag this

  • magic October 28, 2008 at 6:14 pm

    His other daughter is going to resent all the attention he gives to the twins, who BTW need to be wearing diapers at the very least.

    Flag this

  • Libra October 28, 2008 at 7:05 pm

    Did he say a level of sexy and chic that I really want to portray. Babies aren’t meant to be sexy or least in my opinion but then again I’m not here to judge. These are that man’s kids!

    Flag this

  • Libra October 28, 2008 at 7:07 pm

    …And I think they are cute and I am not just saying that because they are Sean Combs’ kids because Sean Combs is not a favorite of mine

    Flag this

  • KiKi October 28, 2008 at 8:48 pm

    It bothers me every time I see it. He is posing like the pimp with his “hos”

    Flag this

  • hanna October 29, 2008 at 3:58 am

    Very disturbing photo. Diddy, there are too many pedophiles out there!! Shame on you and Kim for taking part of this.

    Flag this

  • Mater October 29, 2008 at 5:33 am

    Hello these are HIS children people! I am pretty sure the man is just taking a picture with them and not trying to give sadistic perves something to wank off to. I mean who thinks like that

    Flag this

  • ladybug October 29, 2008 at 4:11 pm

    Take the babies out of the picture, and have Diddy sit their naked thats sexy, Take Diddy out and have the twins by themselves thats cute, but when you try to mix the both together (sexy & cute) its not working. :(

    Flag this

  • Carlita L. Smith October 29, 2008 at 9:34 pm

    EVERYONE PLEASE GET OUT AND VOTE. YOUR VOTE MATTERS AND YOUR VOTE COUNTS.

    VOTE VOTE VOTE I KNOW I HAVE.

    Flag this

  • lauren October 30, 2008 at 1:56 am

    This is so disrespectful to the babies. They don’t have a say about how they look, but when they get older I’m sure they won’t like it. These are little girls who are being passed off like they are little naked boys. I just don’t think it is fit for the world to see as a magazine cover.
    Change it Change it
    redo the cover

    Flag this

  • lilkunta October 30, 2008 at 2:37 am

    This sint good 4 a mag cover.
    Y does did have his twin GIRLS dresses as wearing chippendales bowties?
    dum dum diddy.

    Flag this

  • Opinionated October 30, 2008 at 2:54 am

    Why don’t they put some clothes on those girls? That is so ridiculous and very raunchy and uncalled for! They are little ladies and should be dressed as such. Some people don’t need children.

    Flag this

  • CJ October 30, 2008 at 3:50 am

    Can i just say those girls look just like Chance!? As we say in Jamaica – full suit, no jacket! Them twins are gorgeous tho .. worried about em being nude tho!

    Flag this

  • Laura October 30, 2008 at 4:49 am

    How do you feel that your naked twins are superimposed and you left out of the picture. This is what the pedophiles are going to do. Zoom and superimpose your naked babies. Kim is a damn fool!

    Flag this

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.