Comments on: DIDDY AND TWINS COVER VOGUE L’UOMO MAGAZINE

By: Zarria

Zarria — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 21:15:37 +0000

I think the picture is actually cute but you can almost see their privates.

By: hanaboo

hanaboo — Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:28:34 +0000

am i the only one who think they look like LIL BOYS! i mean they are cute but bowties? they look like boys
an how come hes fully clothed?

Flag this

By: Ada

Ada — Fri, 26 Dec 2008 17:50:12 +0000

Altho the children are nude, fortunately their genetalia ARE NOT in view!!! If all you folk can do is get all upset about the “nudity” of the kids, then that says something about YOUR mentality…not so much the parents. Remember, this was for a EUROPEAN magazine cover, not an American one. Europeans are far LESS UPTIGHT about nudity and the human body than Americans are.

Flag this

By: Not Buying It

Not Buying It — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 12:53:15 +0000

Puffy is a hypocrite. He claims that he’s all for promoting the black is beautiful mantra; yet, I have yet to see sistahs in his perfume ads. He takes a stance, only when it’s convenient. And as for this picture, it’s clear those babies need to be clothed.

Flag this

By: Jaleesa

Jaleesa — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 12:09:51 +0000

I just don’t like the fact that they look like litrle boys…they should have been in cute dresses!

Flag this

By: raina

raina — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 05:42:20 +0000

with pedophilia being an epidemic in this country, putting his children on display in this inappropriate photo is a huge mistake. The nudity of a child is innocent, but it should never be displayed in public for millions of people to see

Flag this

By: Lioness

Lioness — Sun, 02 Nov 2008 20:09:21 +0000

I’m not a fan of this cover. The naked girls look totally out of place on the furry blanket. I’m fine with seeing naked babies, it’s very innocent- but in this cover, it doesn’t look innocent, it looks forced, and I think it would be better if they were dressed. If the setting were different, maybe the the twins being naked would work. Here, it just doesn’t. It’s a weird cover.

Flag this

By: MrsESledge

MrsESledge — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:25:00 +0000

I totally agree with the previous poster, this is tasteless. Why would you want to expose your little girls to the world like this (especially being a celeb). What is up with the bows, Diddy has gone mad. There are sick individual that is loving this about now. As a mother of 4 small children this disturbs me. He is expoliting precious daughters when he think this is cute. Diddy you can’t have everything your way.

Flag this

By: Peter

Peter — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 04:50:14 +0000

Help us Grandma. Help us Mommy. Daddy is bad.

Flag this

By: Laura

Laura — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 04:49:01 +0000

How do you feel that your naked twins are superimposed and you left out of the picture. This is what the pedophiles are going to do. Zoom and superimpose your naked babies. Kim is a damn fool!

Flag this