Comments on: 50 CENT VS SHANIQUA TOMPKINS: 50 WINS THIS ROUND

By: Que

Que — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 04:07:19 +0000

I think it is important for us all to remember that money talks and that is the only reason 50 Cent won. We are not in the situtation with these people and you never know what really went on. We all seem to lose sight of who and what this is really about, the child(ren) being affected. The child must live as that parent does, in this case 50 Cent. Her angle may have been “wrong” but in the end no one can tell her how to fight to provide for her child. These women are not always being prohos, remember, she was there in the beginning, they really do want to see their children recieving what they would if they were in a relationship with that person. Marriage or not, a relationship is binding. Oral agreements are binding. Judges are not being unfair in most cases with amounts they award to these mothers, they are making sure that provision is granted for the child(ren). 50 Cent is not innocent in this and when a man doesn’t respect the mother of his child, I don’t respect him, I don’t care who it is or what the situation. Women need to start respecting themselves enough to NOT be looking for a meal ticket and to want a mate in their lives, not a paycheck. I feel bad for the child who is being dragged into this fight between TWO adults acting immaturely and irresponsibly. Don’t blame one person, if you are going to comment, look at the whole picture and blame both people or don’t say anything at all.

Flag this

By: Shay

Shay — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 18:27:19 +0000

Good for 50. She is too greed. The more she gets, the more she wants.

Flag this

By: Mellisaa

Mellisaa — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 15:26:18 +0000

Shawna ii Didnt Come On This Website To Fight Over Tha Internet Like A Lil Kid ……….Okk
Shaniqua Is Juss Greedy As Said Aboveee

Flag this

By: shardae

shardae — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 09:38:43 +0000

50 got you again there girlfriend you might as well stop everybody know your greedy..

Flag this

By: Kay

Kay — Fri, 06 Feb 2009 18:43:40 +0000

If he wanted her to have half of his money he would have married her. With marriage she would have been legally entitled to half. The fact that he didn’t marry her should let her know (if he told her she was getting half) he didn’t mean it.

Flag this