Comments on: BREAKING NEWS:KATHERINE JACKSON GRANTED TEMPORARY CUSTODY

By: anonymous

anonymous — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:57:39 +0000

Maybe it’s just me, but does Debbie Rowe look older than Katherine Jackson in the above posted picture?

Just my opinion, but if she didn’t see herself as a single Mom raising the kids after the divorce, why should she be a better candidate for that now that she is much older, and no male role model to be involved with the kids under her watch?

She stated on video that she didn’t want the kids, they were a gift to Michael.

To say the kids were gifts, Michael sure paid her for them in past settlements when he was living, and she still desires payment from him for the gifts/kids now that he’s deceased.

By: DEE

DEE — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 06:08:50 +0000

Please!!! will someone please admit the honest to God’s truth. All these years we’ve been told that Debbie Rowe was nothing more than a surrogate whom lent her womb to Michael Jackson because of her strong love she for him and she wanted him to experience this happiness of life which she in return gave and accepted an exceptional amount of money in exchange for this and to go away from him & the children. So now where do we as the people in the world go with this. Have there been any proofs established to let us the world know that Debbie Rowe is truly the kids biological mother any one could have been choosen to carry these children for him. Where’s this proof. Her being married to him does not make her the true biological mother as the old saying goes where’s the beef where’s the truth in the DNA for miss Rowe???

By: Michella

Michella — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:27:47 +0000

Kedra well just because she lashed out on the paparazzi doesn’t mean anything really. I mean get serious I would be pissed off too if cameras were in my face like that!So you can’t really judge her by that!Alot of celebs have lashed out on paparazzi!

By: kedra

kedra — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:06:27 +0000

The way Debbie Rowe (Hot mess) lashed out at the paparazzi she doesn’t deserve those kids. That heffa has a serous mean streak in her. Those kids appear to be attached to Katherine and the rest of the family.

By: Blue

Blue — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 15:39:36 +0000

Wendy where have you been lol? She has a lawywer that has made several statements regarding her and the kids.

Her lawyer has said that she is willing to take a DNA test to prove that she is in fact the biological mother and he has also said that she is deciding whether or not she will fight for custody (deciding IMO means that she is waiting to see how much $ the Jackson’s will pay her to go away).

On a news show (or rado can’t remember which) Debbie has said that she wants her children and she doesn’t want them around Joe. I did not hear this first hand so I can’t confirm it, but I did hear the lawyer so yes she did speak.

By: Wendy

Wendy — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 13:36:50 +0000

Yeah, has she said anything? I don’t believe so! I don’t see her voicing that she wants her children at a time like this. Debbie Rowe loved Michael she practical had a shrine of him at her home.I don’t see her being that crass during a time of grieving. I know she loved him dearly. I know she loves those children as well. It’s the media at it again trying to sling dirt and mud and muddy him up again. What the media does not GET is that the more mud you sling, the more love he gains.

I pray thsoe children stay with their family, who can rightfuly provide them with his legacy and keep them safe. Prince, Paris and Michael II I pray that God heals your grieving heart.

By: memasniece

memasniece — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:26:59 +0000

long as they aint wit joe its all good

By: lil mama

lil mama — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:05:00 +0000

MICHAEL JACKSON WILL FOREVER BE MISSED HOWEVER THE MEDIA NEED TO LEAVE HIS FAMILY ALONE. WHAT I DON’T UNDERSTAND IS WHEN HE WAS ALIVE THE MEDIA AND THE PUBLIC TREATED HIM UNFAIRLY NOW THAT HE IS GONE EVERYONE HAS CONCERNS ABOUT HIS CHILDREN. MICHAEL WAS A LOVING FATHER, SON, BROTHER AND ENTERTAINER WHO HAD A COMPLICATED LIFE STYLE. WHO ARE WE TO JUDGE HIM ABOUT HOW HE CHOSE TO LIVE HIS LIFE. DID ANYONE STOP TO THINK THAT MICHAEL WAS FIGHTING HIS OWN DEMONS AND WHAT EVER HE DID TO HIS FACE etc HE NEVER HURTED ANYONE. I RESPECT HIS FANS FROM OVER SEAS BECAUSE WRONG OR RIGHT THEY NEVER JUDGE HIM AND WORSHIPED THE GROUND THAT MAN WALKED ON.AS FAR AS THE CHILDRENS MOTHER SHE NEED TO FALL BACK BECAUSE SHE WAS PAIED VERY WELL TO HAVE MICHAEL BE THE ONLY PARENT THAT THOSE CHILDREN NO SO THE MEDIA NEED TO STOP AND LET THAT MAN REST IN PEACE BECAUSE IF HE NVER DID ANYTHING HE KEPT THEM CHILDREN SAFE AND OUT OF THE MEDIA. GOD BLESS YOU MICHAEL AND I NO YOUR MOTHER WILL CONTINUE TO WORSHIP AND LOVE YOUR CHILDEN AS YOU DID.

By: Liberty

Liberty — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 06:23:52 +0000

I am still sad about Michael’s death. About the children, here is where I’m confused and maybe I’m missing something, but I keep hearing about Debbie Rowe and the TWO children. There are THREE children and I understand if only Prince and Paris are supposed to be her two children, but how can they separate both of them from Prince Michael II? He is the youngest and would probably be the most confused. They all three lost their father, why would anyone want to separate them? And unless I’m wrong again, where has Debbie been all their lives? How often has she actually been involved? Is it really right for those children to be with her? Please tell me if I am wrong!!!

By: Nappykat

Nappykat — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:54:19 +0000

I think Michael loved his momma, but if you are a ’sweet mom’ who sits idly by and let your husband do some ‘questionable’ (indeed some say abusive) things to and with your kids - then isn’t that like giving tacit permission to do that or doesn’t it make you like an accomplice to abuse?

Kat is sweet but she let Joe head everything and MJ probably resented her for not being more assertive or aggressive and stopping Joe for what he did. But Joe probably would have nocked her out if she said anything so…

I’m not sure if this has something to do MJ not wanting a mom for his kids, I’m just sayin.

I think MJ didn’t want a mom for his kids because he didn’t want to share his kids and have to interact with anyone in that way. I think he wanted his kids all to himself - his ‘living’ legacy (even if they weren’t biologically his).