Home » Michael Jackson

UPDATE:MICHAEL JACKSON IS NOT THE BIOLOGICAL FATHER OF HIS KIDS?

Tuesday, Jun 30 , 2009 11:29:am by admin FILED UNDER Michael Jackson

UPDATED ON 6/30/2009: A lawyer for Debbie Rowe is denying reports that she is not the biological mother of two of Michael Jackson’s children, Prince, 12 and Paris, 11.(Read More)

mj_pics_0019_layer_1_full

-Pictured:Michael and a younger looking Prince, Paris, Blanket.-

According to website Tmz, the late Michael Jackson was not the biological father of his three children and neither was Debbie Rowe their biological mother! In addition, it is being reported that Michael never formally adopted his children.

Via TMZ:

We’ve learned Michael Jackson was not the biological father of any of his children. And Debbie Rowe is not the biological mother of the two kids she bore for Michael. All three children were conceived in vitro — outside the womb.

Multiple sources deeply connected to the births tell us Michael was not the sperm donor for any of his kids. Debbie’s eggs were not used. She was merely the surrogate, and paid well for her services in the births of Michael Jr. and Paris.

In the case of Prince Michael II (the youngest), we’re told the surrogate was never told of the identity of the “receiving parent” — Michael Jackson. Three days after Prince was born at Grossmont Hospital in San Diego County, Jackson’s lawyer came to the hospital to pick the baby up and deliver him to Michael.

We do not know if Jackson chose the sperm or egg donors or if he even knew who they were.

Although Rowe is not the biological mother, it’s not a slam dunk that she would lose a custody battle. This type of case has never been litigated in California courts. Since Rowe was married to Jackson when Michael Jr. and Paris were born, there’s a presumption that she’s the biological parent. That presumption can be rebutted by other evidence.

We know there are documents outlining the whole arrangement for the birth of all three kids. Nonetheless, it’s still an open issue with the courts.

108 Comments

108 Comments to “UPDATE:MICHAEL JACKSON IS NOT THE BIOLOGICAL FATHER OF HIS KIDS?”

  • MIZZ NENE June 30, 2009 at 11:35 am

    IT DOESNT MAKE A DIFFERENCE THEY WERE IS CHILDREN AND HE WAS THEIR DAD. HE LOVED THEM AND THEY LOVED HIM

    Flag this

    • Suitepuma June 30, 2009 at 7:00 pm

      See THIS is why I don’t believe in single-gender parent parenting!

      Its selfish… Im not saying that Mike didn’t love his children (he obviously did) but “love” doesn’t replace the basic necessity of having a stable environment which includes a Mother and a Father!

      Death is unfortunate but inevitable for every living being. This is something Mike did not think about before receiving his “gifts” from Debbie Rowe.

      Now what’s gonna happen to his kids? I’m sure their futures were already set up for dysfunctionality because of an absence of a mother (I know about the Nanny but she is NOT the mother nor will she be recognized as such in the court of law).

      Please people, THINK before you have sex/children!

      Flag this

  • Christine June 30, 2009 at 11:37 am

    Would everyone stop talking about Debbie Rowe, they are with there gradndparents and thats the way it should be….the media is going to put ideas in Debbie Rowe mind….Stop opening up a can of worms, if it hasn’t been discussed..

    Flag this

    • Brooks June 30, 2009 at 2:07 pm

      I agree its like the media just wanna be startin somethin

      Flag this

      • Lisette June 30, 2009 at 5:08 pm

        they need to beat it (hee hee) RIP Mike

        Flag this

  • Tia June 30, 2009 at 11:38 am

    Lol I didn’t need a report to know that those weren’t his kids.

    Flag this

    • Kali Kat June 30, 2009 at 4:35 pm

      **** LATEST BREAKING NEWS *****

      US Weekly is reporting that MJ’s dermatologist Arnold Klein (a white guy) is the sperm donor of his 2 oldest children.

      I don’t know if it’s factual, but for those following the story that is the latest info out there.

      Google it

      Flag this

  • Kiki June 30, 2009 at 11:40 am

    You would be a fool to believe he was! I am however surprised that Debbie isn’t the bio mother. Paris really favors her.

    Flag this

    • MoNiQuE June 30, 2009 at 1:18 pm

      wishful thinking

      Flag this

    • Blue June 30, 2009 at 1:31 pm

      I see so much of Debbie in those kids. I will be in complete shock if they are really not hers biologically. Michael is a different story.

      Flag this

    • MoNiQuE June 30, 2009 at 1:48 pm

      well @ least they hv a fam that love them

      Flag this

  • onnum2 June 30, 2009 at 11:43 am

    well its obvious mike is not, any blind man can see that, but I thought debbie was the mother to the two older kids, and a surrogate was used for the youngest. Well I guess when it rains it pours. There is going to be a lot of info coming out now about mike who was so private. Man I hope everything gets settled and these poor kids dont have to suffer anymore. They have been through enough as it is.

    Flag this

  • Lenae June 30, 2009 at 11:44 am

    Who the F cares??? Are the people who care so much about the paternity of the children going to take it upon themselves to raise these children?? I dont think so. HE IS THEIR FATHER.. He has taken care of these children for quite sometime without anyone worrying about if he was the children’s actual father. He has been a father to them financially, physically, and emotionally which is more than can be said about some of these ppl making these comments. What is the use in specualting about the kids “sperm donor”? Stop throwing dirt on this man’s name and family

    Flag this

    • Angel June 30, 2009 at 12:06 pm

      I cant take the media serious! I dont think this is the proper time to disclose such info to these already greif stricken children. Michael is the only Parent they have ever known, and to now discredit that has to be unnerving. These children will never have a sense of belonging. They wont know their “father” or mother.

      Flag this

  • April Shaw June 30, 2009 at 12:09 pm

    so the only one that’s really his is Blanket?

    Flag this

    • H~Boogie83 June 30, 2009 at 12:33 pm

      No, all 3 are REALLY his.

      Flag this

  • Monique June 30, 2009 at 12:27 pm

    It seems he REALLY didn’t want any black kids. I love Mike’s music but it really bothered me at the lengths he went to separate himself from who he really was. He didn’t even want them to have his sperm.

    Those kids, however, need to be with the Jackson family.

    Flag this

    • Blue June 30, 2009 at 1:33 pm

      He claimed that Blanket’s mother was black. I don’t know if he meant the egg donor or the suragate…or maybe they are the same woman?

      Flag this

    • Lisette June 30, 2009 at 6:05 pm

      I meant, Hating your looks and hating your race/culture are NOT necessarily the same.

      Flag this

    • Suitepuma June 30, 2009 at 6:38 pm

      Lisette

      I co-sign 100%

      couldn’t have put it better except maybe he really did want to be White.

      If you think about it most of the people that let him down and abused him were his family members and peers (i.e. Black people) and most of the people that came across as his friends (but still used him) were White like his entourage,staff, celebrities and fans… just sayin

      Flag this

    • shesh1nes July 1, 2009 at 7:47 am

      I agree with what lisette is saying one hundred percent.

      However, I think that it cannot be healthy the way those kids were raised in such secrecy. It can’t be good for them to also be hiding who they are or have it hidden from them. I do believe that Mike had body dysmorphic disorder, but how good could it be for those children to be raised by a parent who was so self hating. This must all be extremely confusing for them at best.

      Flag this

  • Meme June 30, 2009 at 12:43 pm

    Im so upset over all of this. Gid bless those poor kids and the Jackson family.

    Flag this

  • Meme June 30, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    Oops. I meant to say God bless those sweet children.

    Flag this

  • Kristen Parcus June 30, 2009 at 12:56 pm

    They all look happy together and that’s what matters!

    Flag this

  • K June 30, 2009 at 12:56 pm

    Are we really surprised by this?

    Flag this

  • Big Blue June 30, 2009 at 1:01 pm

    Paris couldn’t possibly be his biological daughter. Anyone who has one drop of black in them would produce a child with at least some black features. And Paris has none.

    Flag this

  • Kiki June 30, 2009 at 1:05 pm

    The really sad part is these kids won’t know who they are and where they came from. If Debbie was the mother, they would at least have a connection to their past. They will have a LOT of questions growing up. I really feel for them.

    Michael, was really sick. I mean mentally sick. Fame comes with a hefty price and he didn’t have a stable foundation to fall beack on either. HE gave us all so much and lost himself in the process.

    Flag this

  • Bunny June 30, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    I think they really are his, Both sons look similar to him. and even if they weren’t his, he was a father to them that’s all that matters.

    Flag this

  • MoNiQuE June 30, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    u dot say

    Flag this

  • mommashane June 30, 2009 at 1:37 pm

    so does this mean that they won’t be featured on BCK since they are no longer “black”? Its very sad that information like this is thrown out in the media with no thought to how it will affect these childrens lives. Everyone wants to look at them like their freaks –sound familiar–its the same thing they did to their father. I hope Mrs. Jackson has kept all of this news media away from those children. I just hate that they will grow up and later search the internet and find all of these horrible stories about them. Pray for the family and these children they need love and encouragement from our community not scorn.

    Flag this

  • JayJay June 30, 2009 at 1:42 pm

    Jannieboo thank you for speaking some sense. Im sick of everybody going on like there is one standard colour, hairstyle and complexion for black people, let alone bi/multi racial people. When you mix these things up, you cant be sure how they will come out. For instance, wesley snipes kids look pure asian to me, but their daddy is a dark black man. Thats genetics.
    I come from a very mixed up family, and we run a whole rang of skin colours. I have dark skinned mixed race cousins who have the longest straightest hair, even more so than their mother. I have blonde blue eyed cousins who look white, but their daddy is a very dark man. If you saw everyone together you couldnt say who is what for certain. To me when theyre next to michael whos very pale and WHITE you can see they are tanned. Oh the blue eyes MUST be conclusive, despite the fact Joe Jackson has blue eyes! To me, those kids resemble their daddy, and you can see the genuine affection.
    And why is everyone speaking this trash any way, we all know genes dont make a father, hence all those dead beat daddies out there, and fatherless children. He wanted them, he loved them, he raised them, they are HIS CHILDREN. And they just lost their father. When I read how they responded when they were told he had died it just broke my heart. If it turns out that debbie rowe is the biological mum, who here can possible say just because they share DNA they should go to her when she sold them out so willingly.
    Im so sad that Michael couldnt over come his demons to stay alive for his poor babies.

    Flag this

  • Nisha June 30, 2009 at 1:43 pm

    I agree with you 1000%!!!

    Flag this

  • Dangerous Lee June 30, 2009 at 1:49 pm

    Many people keep talking about Mike didn’t want to be Black. Check the Oprah interview people…whether you believed it or not he had a skin disease called vitiligo. Also, biracial kids come in many shades. The Jackson family also have a mixed background. Genes are a wonderful thing. The children, especially the boys do resemble Mike, so until a reputable report is released or a DNA test is done I am not buying it. One day they report that Mike is not the biological father and then the next day they report that Debbie is not the biological mother. It’s getting ridiculous. Lots of rumors and mistruths falling out of the sky. It will all come to light soon. Lets give it a damn rest!

    Flag this

    • Angel June 30, 2009 at 2:35 pm

      I agree! Lets call up Maury and get a DNA test. I wont believe it until that is done. By the way I just watched the Oprah interview and saw how he vehemently proclaimed his love of his blackness. Please media let this man Rest In Peace and give his family and children some solace.

      Flag this

  • Nappykat June 30, 2009 at 1:50 pm

    Oh…my…god.

    This…is…so…surprising.

    I..mean…those…kids…look…black!
    and..they..are…not…MicheaL’s?
    They…are…not…his…biological?

    I…mean…this…is…the…surprise…of…CENTURY!!!

    I…just…cant…believe…it!

    It’s…incredible!

    It’s…inconceivable!

    It’s… unfathomable!

    How could he?

    Why did he?

    What was he thinking?

    What were we thinking?

    Oh my god!

    THOSE AREN’T MJ KIDS!!

    But they are white, blond, and peachy-cheaked like Michael!

    What do you mean those aren’t his kids?

    IM IN ABSOLUTE SHOCK!!

    ABSOLUTE SHOCK i tell you.

    ABSOLUTE SHOCK!!!!!!!!!!!

    Flag this

    • Angel June 30, 2009 at 2:37 pm

      LOL

      Flag this

    • Tiana June 30, 2009 at 10:35 pm

      LMAO!

      Flag this

  • Nappykat June 30, 2009 at 1:52 pm

    Ay, where did they get the baby pictures?

    Does everything get released and come out into the open since he died?

    Flag this

  • MixtryMama June 30, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    I agree, too. But no matter what, I don’t think any of the children are 100% white!

    Flag this

  • MixtryMama June 30, 2009 at 2:01 pm

    I love seeing these pictures of him and how happy he was with his children. No matter what anyone says negatively about him, he loved his kids.

    Flag this

  • JRW June 30, 2009 at 2:05 pm

    It takes more than a blood link to be a parent. A Parent/Father he was and will always be to these children. I mean my goodness! we could almost say the same for most other in vitro babies if that is the case, some of them are not biological connected to one or both parent either, yet the parents who wanted them,, raise them and love them, are their parent. point blank period. He is the father. Debbie, well, let’s jut say it is a shame she chose to not be around, at least until now. I wish the children peace.

    Flag this

  • Nappykat June 30, 2009 at 2:08 pm

    OK, another question.

    We really know MJ doesn’t have peachy cheeks.

    So do you think he plays with make-up on himself and the kids?

    Oh my god, that would be soooooo

    SHOCKING!!

    Flag this

  • Mi June 30, 2009 at 2:10 pm

    Why is this news? Michael Jackson is black no matter what his skin now looks like, his children are clearly white. There was NO QUESTION if those were his biological kids, but they are however HIS KIDS.

    Flag this

    • Nappykat June 30, 2009 at 2:18 pm

      I agree with this. They are OBVIOUSLY not his bio kids (OMG THAT IS SOOOO SHOCKING!!!) but they are his kids. Michael and his family are the only people they have ever known to raise them. So I think it is right that his family gets custody, not the paid surrogate Debbie Rowe.

      AND REBBIE SHOULD GET THEM!!

      GO GET’EM REBBIE!!

      or how about Marlon? He ain’t been in the news lately.

      Or Randy Jackson from American Idol.

      Flag this

      • Angel June 30, 2009 at 2:40 pm

        NappyKat you are hilarious…..But I thought Janet would be perfect to get the kids.

        Flag this

      • Ms'girl June 30, 2009 at 4:59 pm

        Randy Jackson from american idol is not their brother.

        Flag this

  • Blue June 30, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    I know how genetics work and I STILL do not believe that they are Micahel’s biological children. It seemed to me that he had body dysmorphia and I do not believe that he would use his sperm to produce children who could have the same features that he hated so much. Does this matter? No! He was still very much their father, blood means nothing. I don’t think that people who believe that Mike and his kids share no blood are saying that he was any less their father. My sister is adopted and she is no less my sister just because we don’t share DNA.

    Flag this

  • Nappykat June 30, 2009 at 2:21 pm

    Ay, do you think MJ was sterile?

    Oh he just didn’t want any REAL mixed kids that clearly would have shown evidence of his and their blackness?

    I’m going with the latter, but there is a strong possibility he could have been sterile.

    Flag this

  • LenaLuvBug June 30, 2009 at 2:22 pm

    TMZ is KILLIN me…does it really matter?!!! Look at him with those kids, they look happy to be with their DAD and thats all that matter’s. Can we shift the focus off of this topic because this has nothing to do with anything. Poor kids..thats their dad! Sickening that these things are being said, I really hope they don’t catch wind of this mess…let them mourn their one and only father. Ick!! this breaks my heart =(

    Flag this

  • Julie June 30, 2009 at 2:45 pm

    I haven’t read all of your comments, but first of all: Does it matter if he was the biological father?? The most important thing is, that he loved them! So many kids are not loved even though they are their parent’s blood. But do you really think they’re better with their grandparents? I think that Michael’s mum is great, but his dad… — My God, he hasn’t learnt anything, as it seems.

    Flag this

  • Keepin' it real June 30, 2009 at 2:49 pm

    Maybe he did have vitiligo but ir does NOT lighten your entire body. Most people with the disease use makeup to match the original pigmented skin.

    I have said b4 that yes biracial kids come in an array of skintones but he wouldn’t have all three to get just the white gene. My daughter is very fair with straight hair but my son looks more like Hallie’s daughter., tan skin and loosely curled hair.

    In the end, he was their father and he seemes to love them dearly. I wish he could have loved himself too. Genetics will matter for a custody case.
    I wish them well.

    Flag this

  • sheyla June 30, 2009 at 2:55 pm

    It doesnt’ matter..but I just wanna say that I think Paris is gorgeous!! She has such a beautiful delicate face.

    Flag this

  • Barlow brings on the logic June 30, 2009 at 3:24 pm

    Has TMZ confirmed their source? Does their source bring with them genetic data to back up their statement? The UK tabloid recently made similar claims, though what I fail to comprehend is why Debbie Rowe would travel all the way abroad to report what inquiring minds right here in America have wanted to know all along? Haven’t media and tabloids who are more in love with scandal then logic had enough? Shouldn’t they take heed by learning from the Pop Icon they assisted in destroying? I guess they’d rather remains so in love with propaganda and deceit designed to keep us ignorant, then educate the public on recessive and dominant traits. It’s a facade that white skinned means white race, so therefore the children must be the result of two white skinned individuals. There are many pink and white skinned africans resulting from two black skinned parents in Africa. I’m not surprised by the handling of this matter though… it’s the same media that sold us a war based on false pretenses, and many people brought it.

    How much of Michael’s DNA was actually African verses non? Quincy Jones is 34% European, and one of the daughters he conceived with Peggy Lipton has a very white phenotype. Yes, you can detect African ancestry in Halle Berry’s daughter, but not so much in Nicole Richie, Rashida Jones, or blonde rising tennis star Jan Silva. Carol Channing, Jackie O, and Heather Locklear all derive from people with African ancestry of varying degrees, yet they’re white skinned. Try googling “Black parents with white kids,” let me know what you think. Remember Donna summer’s blonde little girl? Garcella B. Nilon’s blonde little guy; I believe he’s featured here quite often. Or even Victoria Rowell, she’s biracial and darker then Halle Berry, yet her oldest child looks completely European

    I agree with those that have questioned, What difference does it make whether or not the children are biologically related to Michael. I myself do not claim to know nor care, but what I do know is that color doesn’t constitue family, love does, and it’s obvious that he was a loving and nurturing father. No one has the right to take that away. If Jackson had issues with the color of his skin or racial background, why were we surprised? America tells every black child from he or she’s earliest of beginnings that the color of their skin deems them as something inferior or less, hence his psychological issues surrounding race were the makings of our society. Since Rowe isn’t coming out or agreeing with those that are demanding she fulfill the role of the good white Mommy who stepped forward after an 11 year absence to re-claim her children from the big black family, media will instead fill in the blanks by now stripping her of her genetic contribution.

    It’s ashamed because the children lost their father through death, and this society is now attempting to remove him from their lives completely by saying he’s not their father at all. within a few days they went from being loved and cherished to being viewed upon as rejected unwants that came to be because of Jackson’s psychological ills.

    And we wonder why Michael fought so hard to conceal his childrens identity so that they remain protected.

    Flag this

  • Leo June 30, 2009 at 3:55 pm

    Biological dad or not, he was their father in action and in the eyes of the law. Should they be taken away from their father’s family because they may not be his blood? What does that about children who were legally adopted? If their parents die, they should get shipped back to their blood relatives?

    Flag this

  • Kali Kat June 30, 2009 at 4:16 pm

    Supposedly, US Weekly is reporting that MJ’s dermatologist, Arnold Klein (a white guy) is the biological sperm donor of his 2 oldest children. I’m not saying it is true, but it’s the latest buzz if you want to research it.

    Personally, I never believed his children were black at all. I am 1/2 black. My children are 1/4 black. I am obsessed when it comes to researching ethnicity. When it comes to mixes, I’ve seen it all. Dad was in the military and grew up with mostly mixed kids.

    Yes, I have seen black and white children that can pass (fair, blond, blue etc..), but it’s RARE to create all 3 that can pass for white. What are are the odds of that? Everyone that I’ve encountered that has mixed kids are to varying degrees. Their children may look similar but not EXACTLY the same. One may be more fair or one have more dominant or darker features. That is the beauty of having mixed children.

    If you do happen to think they resemble MJ, perhaps…but the new MJ. Remember he did not look like that in the beginning and you cannot change what you are born with. For him to be brother and pump out REALLY white children 3 times in a row does not make sense at all.

    Flag this

    • Nappykat July 1, 2009 at 3:30 pm

      THANK YOU!!! You hit the nail on the head. People are saying how possible it was for MJ to have those kids because ‘he’s not 100% Black’ (meaning African) COME ON!! MJ is BLACK! 100% BLACK AS ANY UNITED STATES AFRICAN AMERICAN!

      Flag this

  • Lucy Jones June 30, 2009 at 4:19 pm

    For gods sake, it’s weird they are so pale, but Paris looks just like debbie and the two boys look like MJ especially now they are older.

    Flag this

  • Keepin' it real June 30, 2009 at 4:30 pm

    I don’t think we need a lesson in genetics. Some things are common sense. The celebrities that you mentioned are either 1/2 or 1/4 black. That’s why their offsrping appears more european. Have you seen pics of the “real” Michael. Some fans have blind love. In the end it doesn’t matter but for people to assume we don’t understand genetics is ridiculous. CAn you name me just ONE person thst has one black parent that appears completely caucasian? Just one?B/C the fiolks you named are all biracial and they ALL look it.

    Flag this

    • Kali Kat June 30, 2009 at 7:42 pm

      I second that, I don’t know ANYONE with 1 black biological parent who came out looking completely Caucasian.

      Flag this

    • Tiana June 30, 2009 at 10:40 pm

      Does Mariah Carey count? Lol

      Flag this

  • alicia banks June 30, 2009 at 4:30 pm

    the moms are still mysteries

    here is one real dad

    why has no one herein quoted the bible about all this like they did on wanda????????????

    Flag this

  • KEKE'D June 30, 2009 at 4:56 pm

    I have 1 ? How could someone hate something so beautiful as BLACK. I am a proud African American… couldn’t he c that the ppl loved him no matter what his skin color was. I truly do not believe that he had a skin disease and if he did it was a result of daily bleaching of the skin..but that’s neither her nor there. Unfortunately those kids don’t have an ounce of black blood in there system. Fortunately for them they had the experience of a lifetime TRUE UNCONDITIONAL LOVE….Not many of us have the privilege of being LOVE by another individual weather it be spouse or parent the way Michael love and treated them. Anyone that goes to such great lengths to be something there not really breaks my heart. That’s the 1 thing my mom always told me TO LOVE YOURSELF FOR GOD LOVES JUST THE WAY U R….Only god can judge him R.I.P MICHAEL JACKSON…Give the situation I do hope the Jackson r awarded custody of children..

    Flag this

  • kelly June 30, 2009 at 5:33 pm

    Ex-Wife Debbie Rowe Denies Saying Michael Jackson Wasn’t The Father Of Their Children

    June 29, 2009 10:41 a.m. EST

    — Advertisment —
    Anne Lu – Celebrity News Service News Writer

    Los Angeles, CA (CNS) – Michael Jackson’s ex-wife Debbie Rowe did not say he wasn’t the father of their two children. Her attorney refutes the latest interview, wherein she allegedly told a U.K. tabloid that the music icon wasn’t the biological father of their kids, is false.

    Lawyer Marta Almli told Radar Online, “The interview did not occur. The article is a complete fabrication.”

    The said interview, which was reportedly conducted by News of the World, revealed that the 50-year-old King of Pop wasn’t the biological father of Prince and Paris. Michael was said to be lonely after he and first wife Lisa Marie Presley divorced that Rowe offered to have his children.

    She allegedly said, “Michael was divorced, lonely and wanted children. I was the one who said to him, ‘I will have your babies.’ I offered him my womb – it was a gift. It was something I did to keep him happy… I was just the vessel. I wasn’t Michael’s sperm.”

    “I went to the ‘office,’ which is what we called the medical clinic. They impregnated me.”

    “I got paid for it, and I’ve moved on. I know I will never see my children again.”

    Rowe also reportedly said in the interview that they never consummated their marriage. They were wed in 1996 during Jackson’s Australian leg of his “HIStory World Tour.”

    However, Almli said that the interview is a fabrication, but they are unable to answer what actions Rowe will be taking regarding the children.

    Jackson also had another child, a boy he called Blanket, from an anonymous surrogate mother.

    Flag this

  • kelly June 30, 2009 at 5:39 pm

    how can you people make a make a judgement from BABY pictures.THE KIDS ARE LIKE 5 AND UNDER IN THESE PICS. they are 12 11 and 7 now. Alot of kids look one way when their little and change as they get older. Michael kids don’t even look like that anymore. especially the boys if you see the now you can tell the “black” started to come in

    Flag this

  • jj June 30, 2009 at 7:18 pm

    here we go again with the darn color for one my kids r the same color and i gave birth to all three does this mean i hate my color no its means that the blood that’s in me and my husband made our children the girl looks just like Debbie and the boys do look like Michael i am not surprise as to all the idiots saying they are not his kids. They have michaels eyes and his nose before the all surgery look at the oldest boy pic and blanet is hands down Michael this is just ridiculous next they will be saying mike either fake his death or committed suicide all this speculation is just garbage and the man they claim is the father this kids look nothing like him they look like their parents mike and debbie

    Flag this

  • jj June 30, 2009 at 7:27 pm

    thank you well said

    Flag this

  • jj June 30, 2009 at 7:30 pm

    thank you well said and agree 100% we know mike is the papee

    Flag this

  • Danielle June 30, 2009 at 7:38 pm

    I agree with all the post regarding questioning the race of his children. Also, who says the public needs to know if those are his biological children, why do we feel that we are entitled to all of Michael Jackson’s personal information. That is his business, and maybe he wanted that information private and that is his families’ prerogative to decide if that information is made public.

    Flag this

  • Barlow brings on the logic June 30, 2009 at 7:39 pm

    (ANSWERS TO RESPONSE) aren’t the majority of blacks who reside in the United States of mixed race ancestry (That is if we are to assume that race exist) as the result of slavery? Also I acknowledged mixed race heritage in some of the celebrities I mentioned. Quincy Jones does not identify as mixed race, and is listed in Wiki as being born to an African American family. He only became aware of the degree of his European contribution on “African America lives,” Where he and Skip Gates found themselves be more blended then previously assumed. Is Jan Silva’s father of mixed race ancestry? What about Garcella B. Nilon? I do believe the first is listed as being African American, and the other of Haitain heritage. Silva’s family is displayed on his website. Joe Jackson has light eyes, such an attribute could be indicative of possible European ancestry, wouldn’t such genes flow through Michael’s veins too?

    Of course I’ve seen pictures of the real Michael Jackson. I’ve enjoyed his music since I was a small child, and I’m now well into my late thirties. I’ve also seem images of those that suffer from vitiligo and how it starts out on the left hand; remember the glove?
    It’s obvious that he suffered as the result of America’s racial dynamics, I thought I acknowledged that too.

    Some say that Michael Jackson used a skin bleaching cream; I don’t know, but can you name the skin bleaching cream that Michael Jackson utilized stripping himself completely of all color? Skin creams are marketable throughout Asia, Africa, and parts of Latin America, and I’m sure that due to the remnants of colonialism that still plagues the mindset of many, buyers of such products would love to know the brand or technique some claim Michael relied so heavily upon. The Africans I’ve seen who’ve grown accustom to long term reliance on the creams usually appear ashen, blotchy, or gray rather then stark white

    The real issue is the children, and the way they’re being destroyed as the result of endless accusations. Regardless of whether the kids are BLACK OR WHITE, biological or not, the children belonged to Michael Jackson, and no one should be able to tarnish nor take that away.

    Flag this

  • CocoSupereme June 30, 2009 at 7:54 pm

    I don’t know why people continue to worry about the paternity of those kids…he loved them and that’s all that matters. As an adopted child I can understand that a person can be a parent without one ounce of dna and love that child inconditionally. Remeber that Mike has had a lot of changes to his apperance, why not try to look as much like your children as possible? I think those kids need to be with Mike’s family the people who really loved him for who he was not what he sang or what he looked like. I personally think he was a very troubled man and that the price of fame came at toooooo high of a price for him. As a psychology major I could go further into my synopsis of his life and go on and on but I will conculde by saying HE LOVED his kids so much so that he wanted to protect them and keep them out of the public eye, whether they are 100% black is not important.

    Flag this

  • Joylyn June 30, 2009 at 8:52 pm

    Please explain to me why some of u believe this crap about these kids are not Michael Jackson’s. The two boys look like him more so the older one. And please explain to me why the kids can’t look white but still have black in them. Unless proven DNA says other wise they are his. And even if DNA says no it is still his kids. He has raised nurtured and cared for them. Look at Obama’s late mother who was white and his father a very dark-skinned AFRICAN. Looking at that man he dose not look like he has a drop of white in him but nobody is questioning anythig about that. Whose to say that was his biological mother?? I believe that she was I’m just throwing that out there to get some of u stupid ass people who thinks that they know about danm genetics. A few years ago a documentary about George Washington (I think) but it was one of the U.S. presidents and it showed how his decendants from the slave he had owned and a relationship with wanted to have rights to the same plot of land as his “WHITE DECENDANTS”. If u saw the range of colors these people were it was amazing. They were from the darkest of the dark; white as damn snow and everything else in between. DNA proved that they were his decendants. I had a friend who had three brothers…she looked spanish; 0ne brother looked white (pale skin; red hair w/freckles); another looked like a light-skined black and the other looked black/spanish. And they all share the same parents. And FYI it’s been said that Michael’s great-grandfather had blues. Do u people ever stop and think about how genes skips generations. Get a F@#$ing clue and let this man rest in peace.

    AMEN

    Flag this

  • KyDerbyPrincess June 30, 2009 at 10:24 pm

    I agree w/Lisette’s cmmts..& reading tha other cmmts I have 2 add, Chilren r Adopted into Loving Homes erday & just becuz U r a biological parent does it make u a good Parent? Michael Loved those Children He was & remains their Father, I really hope Janet & Catherine raise His Babies they were His Pride & Joy..

    Flag this

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.