Home » Michael Jackson, links

A CELEBRITY BABY BLOG PARTY: “THOSE ARE MICHAEL JACKSON’S KIDS”

Saturday, Nov 21 , 2009 10:22:am by admin FILED UNDER Michael Jackson,links

michaelblanket

Today’s celebrity baby blog party is brought to you by a picture of Blanket(Michael’s younger son) and Michael as a young boy(R). This picture as well as the others you are about to see were submitted by reader Isabella(Bella). Isabella is fed up with BCK readers for saying that Paris, Prince I, and PrinceII a.k.a Blanket aren’t Michael Jackson’s kids. Check out Isabella’s picture collages below:

Twins

Blanket / Michael comparison (TWINS) pics 1

Blanket / Michael comparison (TWINS) pics 2

Blanket / Michael comparison (TWINS) pics 3

Michael face (your left) Blanket (your right). Their faces literally match! Identical!

Prince/Michael comparison pic

Michael/Blanket 2

Michael/Blanket 3

Michael/Blanket 4

Michael/Blanket 5

I bet you can’t even tell Blanket and Michael apart!

Paris is a biracial version of her mother but has the famous Jackson smile

Isabella says: “Nough said, the biological talk is so old now and so yesterday’s story.”

BCK Says: Well, BCK readers, what do you think? Does Isabella have a point?

192 Comments

192 Comments to “A CELEBRITY BABY BLOG PARTY: “THOSE ARE MICHAEL JACKSON’S KIDS””

  • AL November 23, 2009 at 12:17 am

    The children are Michael’s biological children. I think too many people do not think for themselves. If it is mentioned or printed in the media, then, it must be true for them. Michael was not treated fairly in the media. He was treated like a dog. Black people are as guilty as anyone else because we did not support him as we should have. Instead we looked at the superficial and the lies and accepted them. There were very few people, of any race, who were strong enough to verbally support Michael when others were ripping him apart. All of this clouds people’s thinking.
    We are disrespecting Michael’s children by these terrible blogs. Go buy his CDs; go see This Is It; send letters of condolence and support to the Jackson family; when you see posts of his children, just say they are beautiful; you wish them well and God’s continued blessings.

    Flag this

    • Divaluvmj November 23, 2009 at 7:11 am

      A***F***ing men!!!! People are soo ignorant. The children are beatiful and they are MJs PERIOD. One day they will grow up and I hope cuss all stupid and ignorant folks out. They know and have known who their father is and thats MICHEAL JOSEPH JACKSON . This has got to stop its so disrepectful to those children and their FATHER!!

      Flag this

    • D.Washington December 16, 2009 at 11:05 am

      Only Blanket is his son look at his eyes,hair and skin color and comparison of the photos they look exactly alike. The other 2 looks nothing like Micheal and Blanket they dont even look mixed at all they have blonde hair and blue eyes

      Flag this

      • Jasmine February 19, 2010 at 3:48 pm

        Those kids ARE his sons and Paris too. IM BLACK AND SO IS MY ADULT COUSIN WHO HAS 2 MIXED CHILDREN. THEIR MOM(MY COUSIN) IS MEDIUM SKINNED BUT ONE OF HER KIDS LOOKS WHITE-SHE HAS RED CURLY WHITE PEOPLE HAIR, FRECKLES, AND VERY VERY VERY PALE SKIN. DOES THAT MEAN HER KIDS ARE NOT MIXED JUST BECAUSE OF THE WAY THEY LOOK?
        ALSO, THEY DONT EVEN LOOK LIKE THEIR MOM THEY LOOK LIKE THEIR DADS

        Flag this

      • Jasmine :) February 19, 2010 at 4:09 pm

        DOES THAT MEAN THAT JUST BECAUSE MY MIXED COUSIN IS PALE WITH CURLY RED HAIR THAT SHE IS WHITE? OR JUST BECAUSE SHE LOOKS MORE LIKE HER DAD THAT SHE IS NOT HER MOMS CHILD? THINK ABOUT THAT…

        Flag this

    • D.Washington December 16, 2009 at 11:08 am

      Just because things are in the magazines doesnt mean they are true…LIke that time that the magazine was saying that Fantasia Barrino was pregnant when she confired that she was not..Therefore most things in the magazines and on tv are less likely to be true

      Flag this

  • Kiki November 23, 2009 at 10:05 am

    I know of two Caucasian families that adopted kids from Ethiopia and the kids look SOOOOOOOO much like the adoptive moms that it is uncanny. There is also a caucasian woman at my church with a daughter from China and they are practically twins. You just never know. Personally, I don’t think they are biologically his. I believe Blanket would at least have some wave to his hair. JMO.

    Flag this

    • BCK FANATIC.... November 23, 2009 at 10:27 am

      @Kiki…why would Blanket have to have some wave to his hair?…There are plenty of bi-racial children who have very straight hair.
      Also, there are pictures of BLANKET s toddler when his hair was just growing in and it was big locks of black shiny curls…google it.
      His hair may be so straight now simply because its so long.

      Flag this

  • ReallyDoe November 23, 2009 at 1:16 pm

    i can’t understand how black people can preach and talk about how we come in all shades, hair textures, eye colors etc., but yet when the subject is Michael Jackson’s kids being his biologically, its SUSPECT?!…..wow! Come on people, being born of a black parent and being able to “Pass for white” is nothing new! Open your minds…what the media tells you is not the GOSPEL TRUTH!!!

    Flag this

  • ReallyDoe November 23, 2009 at 1:33 pm

    Actually kiki, I must say,it makes perfect sense for Blanket to have straight hair( even though he was born with curls, as was both his siblings)…Michael’s family have both Choctaw and Cherokee blood. That is why Blanket, and even Paris have an indian look about them.

    Flag this

  • Surprise November 23, 2009 at 1:53 pm

    I love Micahel & always will but I don’t think Prince I or Paris is his. However, I always thought blanket was because he looks more like them. Just my opinion.

    Flag this

  • secret ninja November 23, 2009 at 2:12 pm

    thank you so much for posting this! i am so sick and tired of people saying those children aren’t Michael’s. you have to be blind, deaf, dumb, and in SERIOUS denial to think they are someone elses. like one poster (Kelly) said: in a few years you will feel like an idiot. thank you bck!

    Flag this

    • D.Washington December 16, 2009 at 11:10 am

      Blanket is mixed..Paris and Prince is not point blank

      Flag this

  • Realist November 23, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    DNA TEST! That will solve the whole problem. I can’t even comment on these childrens looks right now.

    Flag this

  • K.Nicole November 23, 2009 at 4:13 pm

    I don’t believe that Prince and Paris are bio his. But there is no doubt that he is their father. As for BLANKET , Michael is all up and through there he is definiatly hands down that boy’s bio father. Blanket’s skin tone is even richer than the other two. But the point is they are all family. And they are all Michael.

    Flag this

  • AirForceGirl November 23, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    Delusional!

    Flag this

    • BCK FANATIC.... November 23, 2009 at 8:02 pm

      @AirForceGirl…ummmm who is delusional hon?

      Flag this

  • Lioness November 23, 2009 at 8:01 pm

    Well, who was ever questioning Blanket’s paternity? No collage needed to see that resemblance, lol, I always thought it was the other two that people questioned.

    Flag this

  • a November 23, 2009 at 8:23 pm

    Many people don’t believe that those are not Michael’s children because they all can pass for White. Most people who pass for White such as Mariah Carey, Wentworth Miller, Eartha Kitt’s daughter have a biracial parent. Michael said Prince II mother was Black, La Toya said Hispanic. I believe Debbie Rowe only cares about money, and would say anything to keep her money flow. Nobody walks away from their children, Prince and Paris seem like such loving children. Now Debbie is trying to get to know them for her future gain in my opinion. Prince II looks similiar to Omer Bhatti and I believe they are brothers.

    As far as Dr. Klien he knows the Jackson’s can sue him for defamation but yet he still talks about the possibility. No one knows Michael personality and can only speculate about the parentage of his children. They are many adoptive children who look identical to their parents. My friend adopted a little and everyone was shocked she was adopted because she looked and acts just like her adoptive mom.

    Flag this

    • ReallyDoe November 24, 2009 at 7:43 pm

      Well, a person can be both black, and hispanic….and when you dive into Latino ancestry, it is a mix of Spaniard, African and Native indian bloodlines. so if Latoya says Blanket is hispanic, while MJ said he is black, they can both be right. you never know

      Flag this

  • anonymous November 23, 2009 at 8:58 pm

    I believe all of Michael’s children are Brando’s. Prince I looks just like Chirstian Brando. Michael children look biracial just not mixed with Black and White. More like White and Hispanic.

    Flag this

    • kelly November 23, 2009 at 11:13 pm

      poor prince apparently he’s the child of every man under the sun

      which one is it people? klein, lester , brando, maccaualy, some other white man who prince looks nothing like? which one? they can’t all be the father,

      who’s next corey feldman, tom cruise?

      ya’ll need to make up your minds.

      Flag this

    • kelly November 23, 2009 at 11:15 pm

      anonymous

      you might wanna have a talk with caramel, cause she swears klein is the father, and that prince looks just like him. so who’s right you or her?

      Flag this

    • Pisces November 24, 2009 at 10:36 am

      You sound crazy and racist.

      Flag this

      • Pisces November 24, 2009 at 10:38 am

        My comment crazy and racist is for anonymous, not Kelly.

        Flag this

        • anonymous November 24, 2009 at 4:20 pm

          That is not a racist comment. Michael’s children look half White and Hispanic. Most biracial children who look fully White have a biracial parent or a parent that is lightskinned. People keep bring up Mariah Carey, Wentworth Miller, Victoria Rowell, and Halle Berry. These celebrities have a biracial parent and thats why they look they way they do. Even Garcelle son’s look biracial.

          Flag this

          • ReallyDoe November 25, 2009 at 1:25 pm

            @ anonymous…Mariah Carey’s dad was a black Venezuelan, as for Garcelle, she’s Haitian and I’m not saying she doesnt have some white in her background, but she definately has FAR LESS white blood quantum than Michael does….that explains why Michael’s kids are more caucasoid than Garcelle’s in the looks department.

            Flag this

          • Pisces November 25, 2009 at 1:47 pm

            The racist aspect of your comment is the implication that for Michael’s kids to look as they do, they can’t have African American DNA. If there were evidence that the kids were biologically Brando’s or anyone elses, that man would be suing the estate just like Debbie Rowe did to get money and to claim the children.

            If these kids, as you claim, belong to any other man, no matter what color he is, it’s ashamed that that man wouldn’t be stepping forward to be a part of their childrens lives.

            Debbie Rowe was so estranged from “her” kids that she wasn’t even in a position to comfort them as they were grieving at any of the memorial services, private or public. She is after all the other “living” parent of the first two kids. But for the record she does claim them legally.

            No one else has come forward, Hispanic or any other race to legally challenge Michael’s estate or the children’s paternity. What’s your explanation for that?

            Flag this

          • Pisces November 25, 2009 at 1:59 pm

            To anonymous, just because the kids don’t look African American to you, that’s just your opinion. The way they look is subjective. No matter what, they are now being raised in an environment that is predominantly identifiable as African American and even their nanny Grace is an African and she has been in all of the kids lives as a maternal figure for a long while now.

            We are all a product of the environments that we are raised in and based on that fact the kids are being raised as African American people and probably identify themselves as being Black people. If they interface with Katherine, Joe and their aunts and uncles, they can’t help but relate to themselves as being Black or that they are at least part Black.

            All Blanket has to do is look at this comparison picture of himself and of his Dad when he was little to know that his Daddy was a Black man.

            The kids interface with and identify their immediate family as African American people. They wake up looking in Black grandma Katherine’s face every day that God allows.

            Flag this

  • ReallyDoe November 24, 2009 at 1:45 pm

    I wish someone would post a collage of the other two kids….because they really do look like jacksons as well

    Flag this

    • Leo November 24, 2009 at 2:26 pm

      What ‘other two kids’? Omer and the other dude who claims Michael is his dad? *groans* When will it end…

      Flag this

    • Pisces November 25, 2009 at 2:30 pm

      Now that Michael Jackson has passed, and his Will has been probated and settled, you can believe that any outside children would have already staked their claim and come forward with physical evidence linking them to Michael Jackson as their father. This would have been put into public record and would have made headline news around the world.

      As far as public knowledge of such, I don’t believe any evidence has been forth coming that shows that Michael claimed any other children as his. Maybe you know something that me and thousands of others don’t know.

      Absent DNA, what transpired under law after his demise with his Will, is strong proof that the three kids that Katherine is continuing to rear to adulthood, per her son’s request in his last Will, are his kids.

      Flag this

  • AL November 24, 2009 at 3:08 pm

    I have come to the realization that people must love the entire Jackson family. I can’t think of any other family of entertainers who have such a following–and for so long. People can name all generations of the Jackson family. People can tell you something aboutall generations of the Jacksons. People have opinions about all generations of the Jacksons. The Jacksons are fascinating and loved!!

    Flag this

  • jess November 25, 2009 at 8:09 am

    when i will see the mother of blanket, then i will know if he was his biological father , we don’t know his mother so cannot say anything

    Flag this

  • Bravo November 27, 2009 at 8:06 am

    I don’t understand how people are so stupid that they believe these children are Michael’s. Prince does not have vitiligo, for one thing. He was very dark in summer. So was Paris. This was a tan. White people tan all the time. The tan fades really fast in white people. Darker races that tan hold the tan longer. The white spots you see are his natural color coming back. If he was so dark naturally, then tell me why there is a big white spot on his wrist where his watch should be?

    Blanket is not his either. They look nothing alike, except for large dark eyes. Take a good look at Blanket head on. And then take a good look at Michael head on. There is nothing there.

    Face it. Michael Jackson was a liar. Sure the kids are attractive, but they were not his kids.

    Flag this

    • Pisces November 27, 2009 at 11:56 am

      You’re crazy and superficial. These kids are more legally Michael’s than probably most people you know who don’t know who their mamas or daddies really are, and aren’t claimed by any Daddy on their birth certificates.

      It’s in court where it matters who their parents are.

      Flag this

    • jess January 30, 2010 at 11:35 am

      i share your guess, i don’t know why people try to find the features between them ,that seems obvious they aren’t his

      Flag this

  • Kaima-Vien. Joshua. Isiah. Jaise November 27, 2009 at 12:53 pm

    Hmm .. these pictures have really made me think now. But what i dont understand is how michaels apparent kids are so fair skinned when michael has the genes of a black person. I have to admitt though, blanket and him have very similar features.

    Flag this

    • ReallyDoe November 28, 2009 at 10:55 pm

      stranger things have happened Kaima, With the media talking a lot of [EXPLETIVE] in our ears, its easy to believe them….but for the fact that the kids do resemble Michael, each other, and his family as well

      Flag this

  • Pisces November 27, 2009 at 3:16 pm

    Hmmm..I guess the same can be said of the actor Taye Diggs. How can a man as blue black as Taye Diggs is, have a baby so fair? I look forward to when BCK gives us another glimpse of that celebrity’s baby to see if the color of skin or texture of hair is changing.

    Seal is pretty dark skinned too, and has “fair” complexioned kids. The list goes on and on. These men are darker skinned than Michael ever was yet, the paternity of their kids is not in question.

    This phenomenon must be a result of the fact that Michael publicly stated that he used surrogates.

    Flag this

  • Bravo November 27, 2009 at 5:11 pm

    Taye Diggs kid is just a baby. A lot of black babies are born very fair. Give the child a few years and let’s see what color he will be. As for Seal’s children. They are a brown color. Far from fair. With kinky hair. His children look black. Michael’s children do not. And I know he was the legal father. Why else would he marry Debbie Rowe? But the bio father, no way.

    Flag this

    • Pisces November 27, 2009 at 11:06 pm

      I agree, Bravo, why else would he have married Debbie Rowe? I’m glad he did, though, for the kids sake!

      Flag this

  • 2muchsense November 27, 2009 at 8:53 pm

    All you junior geneticists should give it a rest. You can’t tell someone’s parentage or ethnicity just by looking at them. You’d think people would be beyond that kind of superficial race classification bulls*it by now anyway. Bottom line is that MJ himself appeared to have raised his kids with an African American consciousness in mind (he made it a point to teach them black history).

    Picking apart his kids because you don’t see a resemblance, or you don’t see “blackness” in his children, or you think that his having fair skinned children is a reflection of self-hatred, or you bring in your own judgment, bias, and narrow-mindedness and put this man’s children under scrutiny. You don’t have to take care of them, you’ll never know the truth either way and it damn sure isn’t any of your business… so learn to get over it. But don’t start calling the man a liar and acting like you have some sort of insight that you don’t have.

    Flag this

    • Pisces November 27, 2009 at 11:02 pm

      Agree. We are a product of our environments and Michael’s kids guardian is their Black Grandma Katherine as we all well know! That’s who they depend on now for all of their needs.

      I agree with 2muchsense, we can speculate about genetics to infinity and beyond, but the fact is the kids are being raised in an African American home environment, in the here and now.

      Ain’t none of Debbie Rowe’s family members fighting in court or anywhere else to get the kids out of the “clutches” of their Black relatives.

      Flag this

  • judd November 28, 2009 at 8:09 am

    BCK why? You know what this post is going to do right?!

    Flag this

  • ReallyDoe November 28, 2009 at 10:48 pm

    I’ll cosign 2muchsense, you really live up to your name! Big ups to you cuz you are really dropping the science!

    I’m appalled at the level of ignance,…yeah I said it, IGNANCE in some of these comments. People seem to forget that OJ Simpson’s daughter Sydney is the same complexion as Michael’s kids and had platinum blonde hair that turned brown also as she grew. I bet if someone didn’t know who her father is, they’d have no idea SHE is black, cuz she looks like a white kid with a tan(just like MJ’s kids).

    Please do yourselves a favor, and dont let the media think for you. Youtube this video: PROOF that all 3 of Michael Jackson’s kids are his. You hear what both MJ and Debbie have to say on the matter….and you see a photo of MJ’s grandad whom Prince favors.

    I believe Michael anyday over the media, with the amount of lies they tell on a daily…. People will feel stupid when the truth comes out. Shout out to Bella for this one!
    Also, Michael and Debbie got married so when they had the kids, they wouldnt be out of wedlock, because MJ was always the gentleman.

    Also, it seems to me that Prince and Paris are “irish twins” which is what you call having two kids really close in age, like say, 9 months apart!!! This happens when the parents,after having one baby, dont wait the suggested waiting period of 6 weeks before having intercourse…this, if nothing else shows me that MJ and Debbie were (even if the media says they didnt) having intercourse….because what fertility doctor in his/her right mind,would artificially inseminate a person right after they just gave birth? MJ and Wyfie were definately doing their thang

    Flag this

    • 2muchsense November 29, 2009 at 5:25 am

      I’m sayin’…I think people have entitlement issues…who are you that you feel like you need proof and a DNA test to believe they are Michael’s kids? Just because you grew up on MJ, or brought an album, or saw a concert doesn’t mean that you need an all access pass into his life. It doesn’t have to be proven to you because you don’t matter in the equation.

      I think people get it twisted because they’ve fallen for the lie that Michael Jackson was ashamed of his blackness, but here is something to think about if you can hold two opposing/ contradictory things in your mind at the same time…black self loathing usually comes from the outside in…not the inside out. We as a people have always struggled with how we are viewed and how we view ourselves because we’ve been told that we are and have been depicted as less than, but that is a separate issue than a person possibly struggling with low self-esteem. Stop getting the issues confused. It sounds good to say that Michael Jackson hated himself so much that he wanted white kids, but the truth is that statement just makes people feel better and justifies their feelings that Michael didn’t want to be a part of his own community. We need to stop that stupid notion that acceptance of other cultures means desired exclusion from your own.

      People tried to make him covering his kids faces seem weird, but I’ve read all kinds of nasty comments both here and other places that have been leveled at these fatherless grieving children and I can’t blame him for doing it. In fact, I wish they’d kept keeping their faces covered because I’d hate to think of how those kids would feel having people say that the only parent they ever knew is not really their father.

      Flag this

    • 2muchsense November 29, 2009 at 5:43 am

      I’m sayin’…I think people have entitlement issues…who are you that you feel like you need proof and a DNA test to believe they are Michael’s kids? Just because you grew up on MJ, or brought an album, or saw a concert doesn’t mean that you need an all access pass into his life. It doesn’t have to be proven to you because you don’t matter in the equation.

      I think people get it twisted because they’ve fallen for the lie that Michael Jackson was ashamed of his blackness, but here is something to think about if you can hold two opposing/ contradictory things in your mind at the same time…black self loathing usually comes from the outside in…not the inside out. We as a people have always struggled with how we are viewed and how we view ourselves because we’ve been told that we are and have been depicted as less than, but that is a separate issue than a person possibly struggling with low self-esteem. Stop getting the issues confused. It sounds good to say that Michael Jackson hated himself so much that he wanted white kids, but the truth is that statement just makes people feel better (and justifies their feelings that Michael didn’t want to be a part of his own community) and oversimplifies a bigger issue. We need to stop that stupid notion that acceptance of other cultures means desired exclusion from your own.

      Flag this

      • Pisces November 29, 2009 at 11:49 am

        God Bless you, 2muchsense. These are innocent young children we are discussing. You have a heart.

        Flag this

        • 2muchsense November 29, 2009 at 6:21 pm

          I don’t know if it’s heart as much as basic human kindness. I can see that Michael Jackson was a man that was trying to protect his kids from the torment that he faced on the daily and I respect that. He did what a real parent does: provide, protect, teach, instill…that’s what he did and he did it as a single parent. I’d never come out my mouth sideways about a situation that has been twisted every which way and the only person that could really speak on it doesn’t even have the benefit of breathing.

          As soon as the first white man popped up and left the crack open for speculation I knew it was the beginning of the end. Hook. Line. Sinker. Before you knew it news outlets were looking for and trying to solve the mystery of who the kids’ “biological” father was. They wanted drama and they wanted a circus and when they didn’t get one (because the kids were put in their rightful place with their family) they knew that was okay too. It had its desired effect.

          Flag this

  • c.demerson November 29, 2009 at 2:44 am

    i dont think the kids are his biologically but even still it doesnt matter if he raised them to be his then they are his..

    no one would even care to question the paternity if the kids were all the way black..

    Flag this

    • kelly November 29, 2009 at 2:51 pm

      please there is no doubt in my mind that if all three of those kids were literally clones of jackdson 5 michael complete with afro’s and brown skin , people would still say they werent his. they would come up with another excuse, like say randy or jermaine one of his other brothers donated the sperm. people just don’t want to admit that michael had SPERM could have children and thats the truth, it bugs them for whatever reason.

      Flag this

      • 2muchsense November 29, 2009 at 5:44 pm

        You might be right about that. lol I just think the whole conversation should be off limits because people have drawn a line in the sand and won’t move from there “side”. It amazes me just how “certain” people are about something they don’t know anything about. It’s a shame because what’s really at work here is people transferring that same blinding white hot spotlight along with everything that comes with it from Michael Jackson onto his kids, which isn’t fair to them. I think people should take the kids names and business out of their vocab and let the kids breathe and be normal kids. Because take the Jackson from the last name and the money out the equation and guess what? They are just normal kids that should be protected from this ish.

        Flag this

      • 2muchsense November 29, 2009 at 5:59 pm

        Wash. Rinse. Repeat.

        What happens when you assume? You arrive at an incorrect conclusion because you can’t see beyond what you think you know. There are a lot of brave people on the internet that like to make blanket glib statements about people they don’t know…I suppose anonymousness decreases ones conscience.

        Carry On.

        Flag this

      • Pisces November 29, 2009 at 8:55 pm

        You’re too much, Kelly. You crack me up. Sperm from Jermaine or Randy. LOL!

        Flag this

  • candy November 29, 2009 at 1:59 pm

    My verdic – Blanket is a Jackson. The other two are not biologically.

    Flag this

    • Pisces November 29, 2009 at 8:51 pm

      LOL. It’s spelled v-e-r-d-i-c-T. There was no jury involved, but the California judge declared all three to belong to Michael Jackson. But what you’re saying counts for the court of public opinion, I guess, which has a life and rules of its own.

      At least you allowed him one third ownership…even if he paid for them, they belong to him as much as his wigs, cars and all of his other worldly possessions.

      Flag this

  • Crystal November 29, 2009 at 10:56 pm

    I’m still not convinced, show me the DNA. To my knowledge biological parentage has never been established through photographs.

    Flag this

  • bella November 30, 2009 at 4:12 am

    What a bunch of idiots you guys are! Blanket is literally a CLONE of Michael! What are the odds of that when there are 6 billion people in this world and some random newborn baby that happens to fall into Michael’s lap is not biologically his? Please grow a brain!

    I don’t even look so much like my father as Blanket does with Michael. They are twins! How could there possibly be doubt? This just proves how simple minded you people are, that you even refuse to believe the obvious starring right in your face!

    Prince and Paris look biracial and Prince looks like MJ and MJ’s great grandfather. Go get yourselves a life instead of hating the fact that these kids turned out so beautiful with perfect skin tones (That you wish you had), and perfect hair (That you wish you had) yet are half black and are also already billionaires. You guys are JEALOUS of innocent kids and its sickening.

    Flag this

    • GivetheStoreAway November 30, 2009 at 9:00 am

      Bella, why are you insulting a whole group of people because they don’t agree with you. You can make your point without going there. That is some leap for you to determine that paternity is being questioned due to some jealousy as you call it over some blacks wanting to be/look white or bi-racial–are you 4 real??

      Just because I am calling you out doesn’t mean I either disagree or agree with any one side. I do not know with certainty who is the bio father of these kids. But if MJ acknowledged them as his children, that is enough for me whether DNA bound or not.

      It is so sad to see this thread turn into what it has. Sad.

      Flag this

      • Truth December 2, 2009 at 10:45 pm

        Actually, Bella has a point. It’s like the black person who taunts the light skinned mixed person by referring to her or him as “white girl” or “white boy,” knowing full well that the person is mixed, not “white.” There are blacks who love to hate light skinned mixed people. Why try to cover this fact up? You really believe all blacks are so loving, welcoming, and accepting towards mixed people? Haha. Yeah, right. This hatred and/or jealousy most definitely does exist and she’s acknowledging it (maybe a little too angrily, though). But she does have a point. To try to deny it is delusional. Plain and simple.

        Flag this

  • breemamyday November 30, 2009 at 4:50 pm

    unsteady answers i like it

    Flag this

  • Jonzy December 1, 2009 at 9:17 pm

    I have seen all the pictures of those kids, and none of them look like the Jackson family to me. Using the comparison pictures is kind of stupid because whoever put them up specifically chose pictures where young Michael has the same expression on his face as the children or is posed in the same position.
    The only thing that will really tell the world is DNA. Although IMO Arnold Klein is the father of the first two. The first son looks like him IMO. But what seals the deal is his going to court on behalf of their money. He only went on behalf of the first two. Why not the youngest child? If he loved Michael so much he would want to consider all of his children, just not the first two. Blanket was not mentioned in his attempted petition.

    When I look beyond posed photographs, I see nothing there. Add the childrens’ hair textures and their skin colors, and I am not talking about their tans, I am talking about their real color, and I do not for one second believe that Michael fathered those children. He bought those babies and left everything to them. He took good care of them, so he was their daddy. But he didn’t come about them the natural way.

    Flag this

  • ReallyDoe December 2, 2009 at 8:16 pm

    OMG Jonzy!!!!! How can you not see that Prince and Paris are indeed Jacksons?….ok, check out this video on youtube:PROOF THAT ALL 3 OF MICHAEL JACKSON’s KIDS ARE HIS. You’ll see what Debbie and Michael both have to say pertaining the matter. Watch that video, then make up your own mind.

    To me, Prince looks like Debbie, MJ(pre surgery) and his great grandfather Samuel Jackson. You’ll see this in the video. Paris, as we all know, looks like her mother, and there is no crime in that, but she is decidedly darker than Debbie and has the MJ’s smile and cheekbones, and Latoya’s face shape. If you look at the photos of her at the memorial, you’ll also note that she is the exact complexion as Latoya. The media airbrushes their photos to make them look white, something they could not do at the memorial, because it was live tv.

    Also, you must realize that Facial expressions are exclusive to certain families…There was a study done on that subject in Times Magazine a few years ago (research it). There’s a xmas photo of the kids with MJ and the lady from star wars, and the kids are all smiling without showing their teeth. The expression on their faces were identical to each other, and this couldnt be possible unless they had at least one parent in common(which they do, their father Michael, who they got that expression from). I have seen MJ do that exact facial expression in one of his videos and in some photos.

    By the way, another thing that runs in families, are “inny” or “outty” bellybuttons….and Paris has the same cute outty that Michael had!!!!
    Anyway, I say all that to say this; I’m convinced yall, those are Michael’s shorties. You’re free to disagree, but dont do it based on the kids’ skin tone or what the media says. We all know the MEDIA IS TRIFLIN!

    Flag this

  • RaverRave December 7, 2009 at 10:11 pm

    cud someone please repost the pictures, they have all expired.

    but from what i see of the headlining picture, blanket looks just like him. i always thought he was his!!!! The other two i believed that they could be, but that there was a possiblity of not. But they still looked biracial in my opinion.

    Flag this

    • danielle December 10, 2009 at 11:31 am

      http://i26.tinypic.com/2s7id09.jpg
      http://i33.tinypic.com/2dl3kt4.jpg
      http://img253.imageshack.us/img253/5601/kidsi.jpg

      Flag this

    • danielle December 10, 2009 at 11:34 am

      there are a lot of videos on you tube showing michael to be the bio father. Michael Jr. has Michael’s eyes, eyes brows, wide nose, hands, vitiligo and he walks like him. Paris has jackson ears and his smile. Blanket looks like michael as a little boy. I can’t post pics or videos here but they are easy to find. Also, Prince resembles Samuel Jackson and Randy Jakson as well.

      Flag this

  • Joy December 12, 2009 at 11:37 am

    What is this, a Mury Povich episode?! If we’re going solely by looks then my little brother is also MJ’s son.

    Flag this

    • Jack December 12, 2009 at 9:13 pm

      Exactly, insane. :)

      Flag this

  • Jack December 12, 2009 at 9:12 pm

    I BCK wouldn’t have posted this. Michael fed, clothed, and loved them. He was a FATHER and blood doesn’t matter because he took care a those kids like a father should. As far as I’m concerned they are his kids. This is the kind of message websites should be supporting, loving and caring for children, being a father even when there are no blood ties.

    Flag this

  • ReallyDoe December 13, 2009 at 2:30 am

    I totally agree with you Jack. what I have a problem with, is the ignorance of people who say those kids arent MJ’s solely because of their skin tones and hair textures…thats just lame! These people must not have seen many mixed kids. I’ve seen some much lighter than MJ’s, I’m talking red hair and blue eyes, You cant get much whiter than that!

    Flag this

  • Dolphin December 31, 2009 at 5:54 pm

    Michael Jackson is probably the biological father of the two oldest kids and very likely the biological father of the youngest. I think some on this discussion board are getting genetics (DNA) and phenotype (outward appearance) mixed up. A dark, skinned African American with coarse hair (phenotype) can have a completely white-appearing child with a white spouse. I’ve seen this happen. There’s this black woman (dark-sknned, coarse hair) I know who is married to a white man. Their daughter takes after her husband. She looks completely white (blonde hair, blue eyes, straight hair) except her skin color is what they call olive complexioned. It’s sad though because people who don’t know them assume that the mother is the little girl’s nanny!

    Awhile back, I read this article that said the *average* African American (whose ancestors came from Africa) has 53% caucasion DNA. I think many forget that a lot of black people whose ancestors were slaves are actually mulatto or biracial because of what happened during slavery. This explains why two black parents can produce a child with blonde hair and blue eyes (like my cousin). You can’t determine someone’s DNA based on how they look on the outside (phenotype). Personally, I think all three of the kids are MJ’s biological children. It’s a moot point anyway because legally they are his.

    Flag this

  • imagine January 30, 2010 at 1:32 am

    you people are BLIND if you cannot see that blanket is michael’s bio son. they are identical!

    i dont know about the other two… personally i think prince looks like a young mj, even though he is sort of pale. my reasoning for them being his kids is that…. why would he have one biological kid and not all 3? but who knows. personally i choose to simply believe michael. if he says they are his kids, then they are his kids and that is that.

    Flag this

  • EbonyLoveAndMarriage May 26, 2010 at 11:10 pm

    Blanket= likely Michael’s biological child… Paris & Prince?? Pfttt!! Not a chance. They do NOT have a black father. Those are Jewish Children. Michael having Vitiligo is not the same as albinism.. it would not erase all of his genes that create African phenotypes., Those are Debbie Rowe’s so- called, Jewish children.

    Flag this

  • Jasmine Gibson June 7, 2010 at 1:45 pm

    DR. Arnie Klein is a effin liar.
    (Prince Michael Jackson I, Michael Jackson Jr.)
    1.First of all People always say “those kids are too white to be michaels” but white is a COLOR. Not an ethnicity. Those kids dont look white, they look more so than anything indian, AND black, and blanket probably hispanic and black. Michaels oldest son (Prince Michael Jackson I) has vitiligo. A hereditary disease that destroys the pigmentation of your skin, the disease that cause the changing of skin with Michael, Michael inherited it from his grandfather (Samuel Jackson, who Prince looks JUST like) and passed it on to Prince, Michaels older sister, Latoya also has it. Prince’s hair color is brown, contrary to what people believe, if you look at ANY picture when he has “blond” hair, zoom in and you’ll see that at the root its brown. Also his mother has blond hair.

    (Paris Michael Katherine Jackson)
    2. Out of all of Michaels children it’s the hardest to find a resemblence in Paris, Michaels eldest, and only daughter, mainly because she’s a girl, BUT, if you compare a picture of michaels sisters (Latoya, Reebie, and even Janet) you’ll see that paris looks JUST like her aunts. Paris has blue eyes, people say she cant possibly be mikes daughter because of that, but look at Joseph Jackson’s eyes. Paris’s bone structure is identical to Michaels (and btw every resemblence seen in the children is one from before michael was effected with vitiligo, and had surgery)

    (Prince Michael Jackson II, AKA Blanket)
    3. I think out of all of Michaels children it’s most obvious that blanket, is DEFINATELY his. Their resemblence is freakishly alike, from pre, and post surgery. I don’t think getting into blanket is necessary. GOT ANY QUESTIONS? ask me @TheQueenOfRap on twitter..i’d be more than happy to. Those are all michaels biological children (IDK about Omer Bhatti though

    Flag this

  • Monique August 17, 2010 at 8:57 pm

    They are all his biological kids… Paris looks like Latoya, Janet etc and her mum Debbie Rowe. She has the Jackson smile.

    Prince looks like MJ and Samuel, (Michael’s great- grandfather)also he has vitiligo and it is a hereditary disease (the same disease MJ had) and I really doubt Arnold Klein has it..

    Finally Blanket. COME ON.. Spitting image..

    Hair texture and skin tone doesn’t determine that MICHAEL JACKSON ISN’T THE BIOLOGICAL FATHER..

    MJ you produced some beautiful children..Keep the faith.. Don’t believe the media or Diane Dimond.

    Flag this

  • nappykat August 17, 2010 at 9:37 pm

    She makes a convincing pictorial argument and I’ll concede that Blanket may be MJ’s bio child.

    But the jury is still out on the first two.

    Now I heard that MJ said blanket mother is black…. well I think that may be unlikely.

    Flag this

  • sir_searchsalot November 10, 2010 at 11:49 pm

    I’m really starting to believe that all three of those kids are Micheal’s. And this is coming from a Dark-RED skinned man that has had all four of his kids come out looking anything from being stereotypically “black” looking. Still, even after the shock after shock of my own children, I still looked at his and said, “No Way!” to MJ’s. But I just seen the special on Oprah a few days ago and I’d seen the uncanny resemblance of Blanket to Micheal. Then I seen the collage and any idiot can see it even without the assistance of Maury. Then again, Prince Micheal not only looks something like Micheal, he definitely looks ethnic and has a little budding mustache at a early age, which is a VERY ethnic attribute. His mom looks extremely anglo-saxon (Meaning from England, The Netherlands or Germany) and genetically would have to had a hell of a ethnic kick to produce a child that looks like PM. As far as Paris, she does look so much like her mother, no collage could determine who her biological father was, but again, she does have an ethnic look about her (Complexion, blueish eyes but with a dark ring around the pupils -typical of MOST bi-racial (Black/XXX) children with non-dark brown eyes.

    But for those who really just don’t get genetics and the REAL reason we appear the way we do, remember that it just the product of our ANCESTORS ENVIRONMENT and can be affected by our environment. When you mix two people, who themselves are the products of FOUR people, then who knows what you can get. Especially when those four people are of African, Cherokee, Choctaw, Caucasian of some sort (Look at Joe’s eyes) and that’s just Micheal’s side) Throw some pure bred Anglo in the mix and… who knows.

    [links removed]

    Flag this

  • Robbyn Fitzhugh June 6, 2011 at 9:11 pm

    Hi there this is kinda of off topic but I was wondering if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML. I’m starting a blog soon but have no coding experience so I wanted to get advice from someone with experience. Any help would be enormously appreciated!

    Flag this

  • Jhon July 30, 2011 at 11:48 pm

    I haven’t checked in here for a while since I thought it was getting boring, but the last few posts are good quality so I guess I will add you back to my everyday bloglist. You deserve it my friend :)

    Flag this

  • best linux vps December 11, 2011 at 10:46 am

    Nice post. I study something tougher on completely different blogs everyday. It’s going to at all times be stimulating to read content from other writers and observe a little something from their store. I’d prefer to make use of some with the content on my blog whether or not you don’t mind. Natually I’ll offer you a link on your internet blog. Thanks for sharing.

    Flag this

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.